Electronic technology is perceived differently in the world today because of its fair share of benefits and challenges that affect the lifestyles of individuals. Cockerham and Lin (2018) have enabled individuals to discover various approaches that can be used to overcome the difficulties associated with modern innovations while still enjoying the benefits. By focusing on home technology, scholars take a different approach that allows readers to evaluate their contribution to a majority of the changes witnessed in the corporate world. Similarly, Huda, Jasmi, Hehsan, Mustari, Shahrill, Basiron, and Gassama (2017) explore the impact of technological advancements on the perspectives of the public towards life. From their approach, readers can identify the challenges associated with technology and how subsequent generations should handle innovations meant to improve their quality of life. Although Cockerman and Lin believe technology has a significant impact on people’s way of life, Huda, Jasmi, Hehsan, Mustari, Shahrill, Basiron, and Gassama argue that innovations should be moderated for individuals to discover their potential.
Ethos
Cockerham and Lin explore the benefits associated with home technology and how many people can now accomplish their desired objectives because of the innovative approach taken by these improvements. In one instance, scholars posit that technology has changed people’s perspectives towards communication and the way they interact with other individuals in their surroundings. By using a simplistic approach that improves interactions, individuals are capable of enhancing their understanding of other people in the world today. Throughout the article, scholars maintain an unbiased approach that challenges the concept of innovation that affects people’s lives.
Huda, Jasmi, Hehsan, Mustari, Shahrill, Basiron, and Gassama have mastered the art of interacting with individuals and embrace a unique approach that focuses on improving interactions. In one instance, the world believes that technology is responsible for the various outcomes that affect the ability of individuals to make informed decisions. By focusing on the undesirable effects associated with technology, scholars create an enabling environment where people can hold conversations that focus on improving attitudes in the world today. Likewise, the scholars maintain an unbiased approach that allows both rookies and professionals to relate to the thematic approach used throughout the article.
Comparing Ethos of the Two Articles
Unlike Cockerham and Lin, Huda, Jasmi, Hehsan, Mustari, Shahrill, Basiron, and Gassama explore a different technique that highlights the adverse outcomes associated with technology. On many occasions, the public is lured into believing various processes can be improved using technology. By embracing the proposed mechanisms, it becomes challenging for individuals to live without the innovations, a move that keeps them attached to the technology. However, Cockerham and Lin use a simplistic approach that keeps the reader entertained and hoping for more with their factual presentation of information.
Pathos
Cockerham and Lin focus on the impact of technology on the modern family, an aspect that is likely to evoke emotions because of the various benefits that many families enjoy from different innovations. By highlighting the benefits associated with the modern family, the authors anticipate to capture the attention of many readers and convince them to understand the various attributes that can affect relations at home. Likewise, evoking emotions is one way of convincing individuals to focus on their approaches and the best techniques that other people can use to realize their expected objectives.
Unlike Cockerham and Lin, Huda, Jasmi, Hehsan, Mustari, Shahrill, Basiron, and Gassama believe that the internet and other technological tools should be moderated because of their apparent effects that can ruin the modern family. Without appealing to the reader’s emotions, the scholars indicate the approaches that people can use to overcome the threats to social existence. Technology makes work more comfortable but also exposes individuals to a series of challenges that affect the perspectives of individuals towards life. Even though the authors are confident of their beliefs, they allow the readers to make informed decisions by presenting them with facts.
Comparing Ethos in the Two Articles
In the first article, Cockerham and Lin are confident of their attempts that can be modified to change the perspectives of individuals towards life. In this regard, the scholars evoke sympathy by highlighting the factors that interfere with the modern family and how individuals should be cautious of their approaches when interacting with different technological tools. Likewise, Huda, Jasmi, Hehsan, Mustari, Shahrill, Basiron, and Gassama believe that the reader should be protected by exposing him or her to factual information that will change their perspectives towards a life without technology. In both instances, the reader can identify various aspects that hinder the modern family from living up to the expectations of theorists and pacifists.
Logos
When reading Cockerham and Lin’s article, one will observe the approach taken by the scholar to influence outcomes and perspectives towards the family. The focused strategy on the modern family enables people to relate to the views raised in the literary material because of its impact on their perceptions of life. In one instance, the authors use theoretical arguments to highlight different activities that take place in the modern family and how technology contributes to a series of problems affecting individuals in their immediate environment. Although the direction taken by this resource is strategic, scholars should explore other options that diversify their views on the research item.
Huda, Jasmi, Hehsan, Mustari, Shahrill, Basiron, and Gassama construct logical arguments that are backed by facts, which challenge the overuse of technological tools in the world today. In many instances, individuals are expected to moderate their dependence on various aspects that can interfere with their attitude towards life. Although the world is continuously changing, Huda, Jasmi, Hehsan, Mustari, Shahrill, Basiron, and Gassama believe that the modern population is unaware of the risks posed by the different innovations available in the world today. By creating systems that hold innovators to account, the scholars succeed in provoking the thought process of individuals to question any technological tool used in the modern world.
Comparing Pathos in the Articles
When reading the two articles, one will barely notice the difference in the construction of arguments and other aspects that shape people’s perspectives. However, upon taking a keen look at the intended audience, people will understand the direction taken by the two articles whose focus differs on the impact of electronic technology on people’s lives. In one instance, Cockerham and Lin focus on the modern family while Huda, Jasmi, Hehsan, Mustari, Shahrill, Basiron, and Gassama diversify in an attempt to inform the people about the dangers of over-relying on technological advancements.
Conclusion
Although Cockerman and Lin believe technology has a significant impact on people’s way of life, Huda, Jasmi, Hehsan, Mustari, Shahrill, Basiron, and Gassama argue that innovations should be moderated for individuals to discover their potential. People are supposed to question the credibility of every resource that advises them on the approaches that can be used to succeed in life. Even though many scholars are credible, a few intend to mislead the public and benefit from the confusion caused by their generated information. In this case, both articles are credible but take a different approach in recommending the best tactics that can be used to overcome modern challenges.
