whatsapp

Connect on Whatsapp : +1 206 673 2541, Uninterrupted Access 24x7, 100% Confidential. Connect Now

Source Evaluation and Essay Outline: Academic English Skills Coursework 1:

Name:

A. Student

 

Class:

AES

Date:

 

 

Title:

What is the importance and process for adopting research ethics?

Identify the importance and relevance of producing a literature review.

 

 

Part 1: Source Evaluation [Explanation of why you have selected the sources for use.]

Complete the table below for SIX sources you have found which are reliable and relevant for your essay.

EVALUATION 1Reference:

Block, K., Warr, D., Gibbs, L. and Riggs, E., 2012. Addressing ethical and methodological challenges in research with refugee-background young people: reflections from the field. Journal of Refugee Studies26(1), pp.69-87..

 

How do you know this source is suitable for academic use? Refer to the currency, authority, purpose, reliability of evidence or data, objectivity, use of expected academic conventions.

Currency: The article was written by 2012, it has a high currency.

 

Authority: The article has a high level of authority. The authors Block, K. (Dr) is an associate director of the Child Health and Wellbeing program, Centre for Health Equity, Warr, D. is a sociologist with enormous research experience on health and social issues, Gibbs, L. (Prof) is Director of the Jack Brockhoff Child Health and Wellbeing Program in Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School, and Riggs, E. (Dr) is a co-leader of the Refugee and Migrant Research Program at MCRI and honorary research centre.

 

Purpose: The article focuses on promoting ethical practice and methodological validity of research.

 

Reliability of evidence or data: The article used vast academic reference list to support its arguments and data analysis. Also, published by a high-level academic press, the Oxford University Press.

 

Objectivity: The article maintains a high-level of objectivity based on critical data analysis and methodological considerations to maintain professional publication.

 

Use of expected academic conventions: The article has clear structure and used reliable references.

 

How is the source relevant to your title? What are the useful points / arguments made in the text?

The article presents closely related insights to my topic and objective in research. Asserting the importance and processes of attaining ethical research practices and methodological validity is crucial to my research.

 

Useful points:

Maintains the need to address ethical complexities in practice and methodological analysis of research.

 

Analyses the core ethical principles vital to ethical practice in research.

 

Maintains the need of high-level professionalism in research (relevance of research and use of literature review).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EVALUATION 2Reference:

Giraud, C., Cioffo, G.D., Kervyn de Lettenhove, M. and Ramirez Chaves, C., 2019. Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing. Research Ethics15(1), pp.1-17.

 

How do you know this source is suitable for academic use? Refer to the currency, authority, purpose, reliability of evidence or data, objectivity, use of expected academic conventions.

Currency: The article was written by 2019, more recent, hence high-level of currency.

 

Authority: The article has a low level of currency. The authors Giraud, C. is a Department Member, Cioffo, G.D., is a research with several publications, Lettenhove, M.K., is a PhD Candidate, and Ramirez all work at the Catholic University of Louvain, Belgium.

 

Purpose: The article focuses on expounding the researcher ‘ethos and responsibility’ as a fundamental ethical compass in the social sciences research with the absence of ethics review committees.

 

Reliability of evidence or data: The article used numerous academic reference list to support its arguments and data analysis. Also, published by a high-level academic journal, the SAGE Journals.

 

Objectivity: The article maintains a high-level of objectivity based on critical data analysis and data manipulation through scientific methods of research in social sciences.

 

Use of expected academic conventions: The article has clear structure and used authority citations.

 

How is the source relevant to your title? What are the useful points / arguments made in the text?

The article presents astounding features related to my research topic asserting the importance of maintaining researcher’s ethos and responsibility in doing research in the social sciences. The ethical compass is the driving factor devoid of ethical review committees to guide the practices and methodological conduct of researchers.

 

Useful points:

Established how to navigate ethical issues in research devoid of formal review procedures or the existence of ethical review board.

 

Stress of ethical compass principles for researchers to ensure their work sustains ethical responsibilities and professional capacity.

 

 

EVALUATION 3Reference:  

Lo, A.Y., Grotevant, H.D. and McRoy, R.G., 2019. Ethical Considerations in Adoption Research: Navigating Confidentiality and Privacy Across the Adoption Kinship Network. Adoption Quarterly22(1), pp.75-93.

 

How do you know this source is suitable for academic use? Refer to the currency, authority, purpose, reliability of evidence or data, objectivity, use of expected academic conventions.

Currency: The article written by 2019, has a high-level of currency.

 

Authority: The article has a high authority. The authors Lo, A.Y., is a professor at the University if Massachusetts Amherst with experience in psychology and family matters, Grtevant, H.D., is a professor at the University of Minnesota with enormous research experience on relationships in adoptive family, and McRoy, R.G., is a professor at Steve Hicks School of Social Work Donahue and with vast experience in social work, children, youth and families research.

 

Purpose: The article focuses on addressing the confidentiality and privacy issues that are associated with the conduct of adoption research.

 

Reliability of evidence or data: The article utilizes numerous references to support its data analysis, arguments, and conclusion. It is a publication of reputable journal of Taylor & Francis Group an informa business.

 

Objectivity: The article maintains a high-level objectivity in its data gathering, findings, and analysis processes. The article maintains the importance of ethical considers when working with populations that are impacted by adoption to make research worthwhile.

 

Use of expected academic conventions: No, the article lacks clear structure and conclusion.

 

How is the source relevant to your title? What are the useful points / arguments made in the text?

The article exudes critical strategies essential to maintaining high-level of research ethics and practices. Also, the article relates to my research topic in understanding the ethical practices of handling data sources (participants in the research).

 

Useful points:

Presents the capacity to deal with arising ethical issues during conducting of adoption research.

 

Maintains the need for ethical considerations in treating the research participants to acquire credible and authentic data vital to inform the research.

 

 

EVALUATION 4Reference:

Masic, I., Hodzic, A. and Mulic, S., 2014. Ethics in medical research and publication. International journal of preventive medicine5(9), p.1073.

 

How do you know this source is suitable for academic use? Refer to the currency, authority, purpose, reliability of evidence or data, objectivity, use of expected academic conventions.

Currency:  The article written by 2014, has a high level of currency.

 

Authority: The article has a high-level of authority with the authors Masic, Hodzic, and Mulic being professionals at the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

 

Purpose: The article focuses on presenting the basic principles and the standards of ethical practices in medical research and publishing. The article asserts the need for continued ethical practices and principles of conducting research and publications in the sciences more so, in the publication of biomedicine research.

 

Reliability of evidence or data: The article utilizes numerous references to support the discussions and analysis. The article is a publication of International Journal of Preventive Medicine, by the National Centre for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine asserting high reliability and reputation.

 

Objectivity: The article maintains a high-level of objectivity in research authenticity and forms of scientific and publication conducts.

 

Use of expected academic conventions: The article has clear structure, extensive references, and authority of data sources provided by the National Centre Biotechnology Information, U.S.

 

How is the source relevant to your title? What are the useful points / arguments made in the text?

The article is related to my research in asserting the significance, relevance, and processes of data fabrication as a major component of ethical research practices. Also, expounds on the use of multiple publications as references to your research. As well, analyses the significance of plagiarism as a guiding principle of professional and ethical practices in research.

 

Useful points:

Plagiarism.

 

Data fabrication.

 

Use of multiple sources.

 

 

EVALUATION 5Reference:

Singh, S., 2012. Ethics in research. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology78(4), p.411.

 

How do you know this source is suitable for academic use? Refer to the currency, authority, purpose, reliability of evidence or data, objectivity, use of expected academic conventions.

Currency: The article written by 2012, has a high-level of currency.

 

Authority: The article has a low-level authority. The author Singh, S. is a politician and member of Political Affairs Committee and National Executive of the Aam Aadmi Party.

 

Purpose: The articles focuses on expounding the significance of reliable and consistent way of thinking which culminates in the spread of knowledge and the truth.

 

Reliability of evidence or data: The article utilizes numerous references to support its arguments and discussions.

 

Objectivity: The article maintains high-level of objectivity in research ethics, professionalism, scientific honesty, and ethical practices as conditions for truth.

 

Use of expected academic conventions: The article has a clear structure and reliable references.

 

How is the source relevant to your title? What are the useful points / arguments made in the text?

The article is relevant to my research topic as it emphasizes on the values of truth, honesty, reliability, and verification of data and publications. Analysing scientific dishonesty and scientific misconduct the article evaluates the deficits of ethics in research.

 

Useful points:

Significance of personal efforts in advancing ethical principles and practices.

 

Relevance of personal responsibilities in minimizing scientific dishonesty.

 

Value of moral cognisance to present the ethical compass and principles for the right conduct in research.

 

 

EVALUATION 6Reference:

Winchester, C.L. and Salji, M., 2016. Writing a literature review. Journal of Clinical Urology9(5), pp.308-312.

 

How do you know this source is suitable for academic use? Refer to the currency, authority, purpose, reliability of evidence or data, objectivity, use of expected academic conventions.

Currency: The article written by 2016, has a high-level of currency.

 

Authority: The article has a high-level of authority with the authors Salji, M., (Dr), an NES Clinical Lecturer at the Institute of Cancer Science at University of Glasgow and Winchester, C., (Dr), a Grants and Research Integrity Officer at the Beatson Institute for Cancer.

 

Purpose: The articles focuses on asserting the significance of literature reviews as a critical appraisal, an academic requirement and essential part of planning in a research project.

 

Reliability of evidence or data: The article uses a range of reliable sources (peer-reviewed publications). Thus, has a high reliability capacity. The article if published by reputable Journal of Clinical Urology at SAGE Journals.

 

Objectivity: The article maintains a high-level of objectivity.

 

Use of expected academic conventions: The article has a clear structure, conclusion, and reliable references.

 

How is the source relevant to your title? What are the useful points / arguments made in the text?

The article asserts the significance of using relevant, informative, and unbiased sources. The article highly relates to my research topic on asserting the importance and processes of research ethics, as well as, relevance and importance of literature reviews.

 

Useful points:

The capacity to write a good literature review requires critical skills of gathering, sorting, evaluating, and summarizing peer-reviewed sources.

 

Asserts the significance of using informative, relevant, and unbiased sources to inform research.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part 2: Essay Outline

Provide a clear plan of your essay, including the key points you will include, and the sources you will use to support your points.

Title:

 

 

 

 

Plan for overall structure
Introduction
P1.
P2.
P3.
P4.
P5.
Conclusion

 

 

Introductory paragraph structure
Background 

 

 

Outline 

 

 

Thesis statement 

 

 

 

Paragraph 1 Topic sentence

 

 

Supporting pointsEvidence / example/ dataCitation
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Concluding  / linking sentence

 

 

 

 

Paragraph 2 Topic sentence

 

 

SupportEvidence / example/ dataCitation
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Concluding  / linking sentence

 

 

Paragraph 3 Topic sentence

 

 

SupportEvidence / example/ dataCitation
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Concluding  / linking sentence

 

 

 

Paragraph 4 Topic sentence

 

 

SupportEvidence / example/ dataCitation
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paragraph 5 Topic sentence

 

 

SupportEvidence / example/ dataCitation
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part 3: Sources

Write a reference list for at least EIGHT sources which you have found to inform and support your essay.

 

 

Cite this Page

Source Evaluation and Essay Outline: Academic English Skills Coursework 1: . (2022, September 01). Essay Writing . Retrieved September 27, 2022, from https://www.essay-writing.com/samples/source-evaluation-and-essay-outline/
“ Source Evaluation and Essay Outline: Academic English Skills Coursework 1: .” Essay Writing , 01 Sep. 2022, www.essay-writing.com/samples/source-evaluation-and-essay-outline/
Source Evaluation and Essay Outline: Academic English Skills Coursework 1: . [online]. Available at: <https://www.essay-writing.com/samples/source-evaluation-and-essay-outline/> [Accessed 27 Sep. 2022].
Source Evaluation and Essay Outline: Academic English Skills Coursework 1: [Internet]. Essay Writing . 2022 Sep 01 [cited 2022 Sep 27]. Available from: https://www.essay-writing.com/samples/source-evaluation-and-essay-outline/
copy
Get FREE Essay Price Quote
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -