A significant challenge in the prevention of chronic illnesses is presented across the globe by a major epidemic that entails being overweight and obese. The condition is Powered by economic growth, industrial development, computerized transportation, suburbanization, and a progressively inactive way of life over the last three decades. Several states have seen the pervasiveness of stoutness in its population twice over and even increase fourfold. Rising occurrence of plumpness, particularly, foretells a shocking liability of illness in persons and healthcare systems in the future. Obesity has become a significant health issue in America as the rate of obesity continues to escalate, particularly in the last two decades. Also, a raging debate continues to ensue over those believed to be responsible for the rise in individuals that are obese. According to Radley Balko’s article “What You Eat Is Your Business,” the author expresses his sentiments by stating that every individual is responsible for they consume and that the government should not be held accountable. However, Schrempf’s article, “A social connection approach to corporate responsibility: The case of the fast-food industry and obesity,” puts the blame on the corporations as well as the government.
Even though Balko and Schrempf differ on the administration’s contribution to the subject of obesity, their articles share similarities in regards to the tone, logical style of writing, and flaws. While Balko and Schrempf differ on those that are responsible for the increase in the obese population, their candid and well-informed attitude exemplifies an outstanding comparison amongst the two articles. The tone at the commencement of Balko’s article is honest and informed as he offers facts on a forthcoming occasion presented by the media houses. Balko affirms as a pep rally for broadcasting, sustenance campaigners, and strategy architects, advocating for an array of anti-obesity programs initiated by the government (Balko 158).
He goes ahead to report that legislators have, by this time, instigated action in contradiction of this increasing rampant. Balko’s tone turns out to be bold and utilizes some rhetorical persuasiveness as he maintains that the legislators’ activities and the pep gathering are the incorrect technique of fighting the menace. He trusts that the administration ought to be inspiring the American population to be accountable for their well-being as it is only the individuals that are able to make decisions based on what they think is right for their health. It is very probable to avert plumpness through a combination of various aspects, such as personal options and societal variations. According to Balko’s article, he believes that there is no motivation for persons to establish healthy eating habits. The kind of communication Americans are getting from the administration is that they are answerable for another individual’s activities; however, not their activities.
In comparison, Schrempf’s tone at the beginning of the article up-front and insightful. She offers specific frightening figures on the subject of plumpness. The rate of obese individuals has doubled up, whereas the number of sternly overweight persons has augmented in the last two decades. Schrempf then deliberates on the impacts of obesity through the use of logic where he expounds on health and disseminates a caution to those that read her article readers that one of every three children born in the US in the year 2000 is likely to develop diabetes if individuals begin working out more and consuming a reduced amount of foodstuff (Schrempf 301). This proves to be eye-opening as the troubling figures appeal for actions to be taken. Diabetes is an avoidable ailment with proper nutrition and keeping fit. Schrempf implies that the companies and regime make it virtually difficult to consume healthy and hearty meals because the fast-food intake and workout businesses are tremendously profitable. The author also reaches for the readers emotions where she goes ahead to warn the population of the dishonesty of outlets that sell fast foods. Also, it indicates the hazards of consuming fast foods and approves that it causes bodily harm and that consumers are not to blame but the fast-food outlets. In the US, a total of $110 billion is spent on fast foods annually, having augmented 18-fold since 1970.
She then references that the underprivileged regions have stress-free access to fast food bistros as compared to the hypermarkets, therefore, indicating enormous upsurge on cash spent on these outlets (Schrempf 302). Schrempf proposes that the administration have a duty to promote hale and hearty nourishments that comprise of fruits and vegetables. They contain little amounts of sugar and are similarly useful in the consolidation of the impervious system. Consuming fruits is another desirable way in contrast to guzzling the fruitlet liquids as fruits contain more fiber and less sugar when eaten as a whole. Even though both writers present a unique argument, Schrempf realizes that it is not just the person’s liability or only the administration and companies as the general well-being of persons likewise matter. Each stakeholder plays a contributing role in this particular subject. Every individual is required to intensify and perform the assigned duties. Persons have to consume healthier meals and workout more, whereas the administration is expected to commence the regulation of the food manufacturing industry and companies. It proves to be the only viable option in order to regulate the rate of obesity amongst individuals.
Conclusion
Both Balko and Schrempf agree that plumpness is increasing comparable to an endemic, which haunts both grown-ups and teenagers. Even though hereditary aspects, as well as other physical conditions, play a part, the crisis is typically instigated by an irresponsible life. Stoutness is viewed as an immense apprehension amongst the youth of the current generation and ought to be prioritized. Therefore, strict procedures should be implemented in the war against this terrible occurrence. The provision of appropriate training on the advantages of keeping fit and watchful consumption is as significant as equal to a reduction of the menace. Most considerable significance must be given to nutritious ingestion practices from the diminutive phase. In other words, it would be likely to eradicate the disorder of obesity from an individual’s life by completely taking the forefront in leading a healthy way of life.
