On January 29th, 2009, former President Obama enacted his first decree known as the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009. The Act makes up for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Ledbetter, 2015). It act illustrates that the 180-day restrictions for filing an allegation concerning wage discernment begins with every new pay check influenced by the discriminatory deed. The verdict based on the in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.’s lawsuit was overruled by the Act, therefore placing restrictions on the duration for filing of the grievances on discrimination concerning wages. The law is viewed as a way of identifying the reality of wage discernment and regenerate the fundamental values of the American regulations.
Thesis Statement: The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 effectively shapes the structural aspect of the American government and its involvement with the checks and balances process.
Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
Lilly Ledbetter filed a lawsuit against Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. in 1998 after she obtained poor evaluation from her employers because of her gender. Additionally, since she acquired a poor assessment report, her wages were not increased (Guy & Fenley, 2014). At her point of retirement, she earned a significantly low salary as compared to her Co-workers and was later awarded compensation for the damages. Good Tyre & Rubber Co. made an application citing that Ledbetter’s wage discrimination allegations were beyond the stipulated timelines in regards to the decisions made on payment before September 26th, 1997.
The First Enactment– Former President Barack Obama enacted his first law in 2009, identified as the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. This law adjusted the decree of restrictions for Title VII assertions by widening the description of an instance that an illegitimate employment exercise takes place.
Reasons for the Amendment– This case between Ledbetter and Tyre & Rubber Co. was a facilitator for the consequent amendment by the Congress of Title VII that forbids discrimination in places of work by managers. It illustrates that victimized personnel ought to file their allegations with the EEOC in 180 days after an illegitimate service exercise (Sorock, 2010). Title VII defines the term “illegitimate employment practice as including various contrasting activities, comprising of failing to hire, declining to issue promotions, and dismissal.
Clarifications between Congress and arm of Judiciary
Whitehouse, (2013) deliberates on the Act and its understandings between Legislative body and the Jury. The Supreme Court’s verdict of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. occasioned in the sensational development of the regulations it had closely cabined.
Details on Amendments of Title VII– Title VII has been modified and marks it as unlawful to discriminate any member of staff in regards to their race, gender, beliefs, and the nation of Origin.
Reasons for the tussle between the Court and Congress– The law court and Congress have been engaged in a tussle concerning the clarification of the civil liberties laws. Congress and the court of law are also engaged in a brawl about interpretations of the limitation statutes under Title VII.
The Media on Public Policy & Elections
The broadcasting industry plays a critical role in the lives of every citizen. Radical discussions, informal banter, and who is contesting for the presidency might be obtained on any form of broadcasting media.
Impact of Media on Policy – New forms of broadcasting have altered how potential candidates engage with the public. Forms of broadcasting have a significant part to play in mobilization of citizens and adjusting the social aspect of a nation (Takamura, 2014). For instance, the campaign plan by Obama and Romney was based on the Fair Pay act of 2009. Obama reiterated his support for gender equality. It was the initial law that he enacted after assuming office. The process took place even after his rival Romney stated that Obama was incapable of assisting women and he could achieve less for them.
Civil Rights Act of 1994– This law is a section of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act was defective. Individuals merely had 180 days to submit an allegation on discrimination at their workstations. Currently, as a result of the Fair Pay Act, individuals nowadays require workers to file a complaint in 300 days.
Impacts of Persuasion
The Act did not just influence the process of voting but also influenced a majority of electorate who were mostly women. Obama and Romney campaign strategies illustrate the impact of policies not only on the electorate but also on what the plan was founded on.
Information regarding the Advertisements– Zucker & Zucker (2009) managed to gather full information regarding the advertisement strategies employed by both Obama and Romney that solely focused on women.
Campaign Agenda based on Fair Pay– Former President Obama’s campaign team developed an advertisement that temporarily positions Obama’s involvement in impartial wages offered to women through mentioning his discrete upbringing. The advertisements developed by both candidates illustrated their intent in winning over a large percentage of the female electorate. Obama selected this Act to be the primary regulation that he authorized as a law alluding to the presidential powers and articulating more for the regular employee.
Conclusion
The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 had a transformative influence on a crucial aspect of the society. Females in society are constantly engaging people to be accorded equal rights in society when it comes to discrimination of pay. The Fair Pay Act is an additional battle accomplished by women, despite the tussle not being over. A regulation such as the Fair Pay Act is highly significant in different aspects and enhance citizens’ lives, although the Congress and supreme courts fail to agree on the modalities of interpreting the Act.
