The notion of death is considered a challenging phase for all individuals. The feelings might result in more excruciating and frightening experiences for the ill and those distressed with terminal illnesses. Besides, a comparable consequence has a significant impact on impulsive, disconcerted, and extreme death opinions. For example, as a patient understands the existing condition, severe distresses develop attributed to beliefs founded on ways the illness makes one vulnerable and utterly dependent on another individual. While many individuals might comprehend a future filled with desolation, other patients trust that dedicating resources for treatment as insignificant as remission prospects remain blissful. Within the case study, George’s beliefs and opinions correlate with his condition and the prevailing circumstances. Following the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, an ailment affecting the brain’s nerve cells and spinal cord, George starts exploring the alternative of aided suicide. George’s case reflects and highlights comparable instances, particularly when confronted with spiritual and individual principles.
Suffering in Christian Narrative
When persons opt to look for medical attention based on healthcare issues faced, they may likely lose the principles founded on the nature of their challenges. According to Worldview (2017), patients no longer follow thoughtlessly to the diagnosis or treatment modes selected by physicians. Most patients are likely to castoff some treatment methods suggested by their doctors, as their faith does not support such treatment modes. Based on the case study, George is defined as a patient ailing from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), which is gradually killing him. It is fateful and depressing that George may be very aware of the things occurring to him along with the course of his impending death. However, he may not be in a state of talking to any individual regarding what he requires.
If George preserves his trust in God in the trying situations, he might get to comprehend that grief and agony befall each individual. George might choose to contemplate on Job’s life; nonetheless, although he is seen as a devout servant of God, God still let dreadful catastrophes occur to him. The catastrophes comprise of wealth loss, kids, and ultimately being ill and departing due to agonizing discomfort with sores on his body. In the face of the material adversity that ensued, the Bible indicates that his friends visited him and were dumfounded contemplative of ways of comforting him. One of the facets that George might learn from Job’s pickle is that he on no occasion cursed God as was recommended by God. Also, she alleged that after he cursed God, death may save him from suffering.
Subsequently, George’s situation bears a resemblance to Job’s torment, as it was believed to be acceptable for him to curse God and passing on. Also, George instantly imagines euthanasia as a way of evading the torment of suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. From a Christianity standpoint, George should perceive his dilemma due to a collapsed world tarnished with anguish and desolation of several forms. Furthermore, Christ agonized while on earth and was ultimately executed, perishing a very agonizing death. Through a spiritual perspective, George might have peace while identifying that individuals exist in a fallen world by evoking the idea that through Christ, people have saved. In heaven, human beings will no longer suffer or die.
George’s Interpretation of Suffering in the Christian Narrative
Christians trust that God created everything in this universe, and Jesus Christ came to the world to allocate a physiological body to the uppermost God to allow Christians to view God in their likeness. Conversely, the Buddhists trust that every element in the universe transpired impulsively, and additional things may still happen, given that they find the precise condition of existence. They contend God does not exist since some individuals tend to signify their creator. Buddhism is based on reconciliation and accord through meditation and is illustrated by the conviction that may define what may transpire at the end of their lives. Based on the standpoint, Buddhists may state that George’s past undertakings were attributed to his past undertakings and could invert the processes through introspection.
The Christians may argue that whatever transpires in George’s life is God’s resolve through the various worship places may provide different causes for the ailment (Worldview, 2017). Others may contend that such an ailment is only allowed to impact the individual to draw him closer to God and have information regarding Christ’s suffering. In contrast, another group may contend that God sanctions such anguish as George lacks divine conviction. This cause aims to persuade individuals to develop a close relationship with God by adhering to every Bible teaching.
Perceiving anguish as God’s will aids Christians to remain resolute in their principles and conviction and, therefore, become resilient compared to before. If Christians believe that the sorrow may be attributed to the past, then it offers a chance to repent and mending the relationship. When individuals conduct wrongful acts and get chastised, it still displays God’s love and encourages Christians to endeavor to lead a life that God requires them to live. These explanations may assist George in opting to assess his life and repent while at the same time trusting that he has received forgiveness and would no longer suffer after his demise.
Christian Worldview Informing His View about the Value of His Life as an Individual.
Based on the situation, George may opt to remain alive if he is assured of good health. Nonetheless, founded on his health status, he does not imagine reverting his health situation. George does not desire to be reliant on close relatives in the management of his daily activities. Furthermore, he is concerned that his disorder may result in being a captive of his body. For instance, he is somewhat troubled by the anguish and suffering he might experience once he decides to live with the prevailing health condition. Because of being a societal figure, he is similarly concerned about losing his pride and authority. As a result, George is not quite prepared to discern himself in the particular state of life, and it may be the reason he opts to proceed with planned euthanasia. He may purposely end his life for him not to experience the forthcoming suffering. Besides, he does not trust in leading a life of agony and travail.
Based on the Christianity perspective, George should not consider euthanasia as the the Bible elucidates that life is sacred and that the body’s strength does not recognize a person’s life in God’s vision. Sharp (2019) states in the Genesis book of creation, man was created in God’s image and likeness. Failing to treasure God’s creation might lead to anguish, pushing individuals to doubt God’s love for them. Based on a Christianity standpoint, being created in God’s image signifies Christians possess an intrinsic value irrespective of the situation. Considering aided suicide portrays under ration of God’s life and letting distress control individual’s lives. Distress due to the imminent agony and failure to live an everyday life makes life euthanasia desirable. From a Christian’s perspective, people are heartened that the prevailing agony is to prepare for eternal life.
Values and Considerations
The Christian worldview views God as the one that provides and terminates life. The Bible similarly places a significant worth on human life as pronounced by God when presenting Jesus to die for man’s sins to reunify with God in perpetuity. Besides, man was created in God’s image, affirming how human beings are extraordinary and appreciated in God’s presence. In the case study, George decides on euthanasia, however, he should desert the course and allow God’s will to prevail in his life. The case study articulates that although ALS claims to live in nearly 3 to 5 years, most patients are expected to live for more than ten years. Consequently, George ought not to rush into encouraging the utilization of euthanasia. According to Keown (2018), the Christianity worldview believes that God has the authority to heal every disorder. For example, based on the narrative regarding Naaman’s leprosy. Christians should maintain their trust in God, notwithstanding not being rendered the preferred healing. It is significant for George not to lose hopefulness and decide on aided suicide as a treatment for the ailment can be discovered. As a result, selecting euthanasia due to fear for the future projections is not the appropriate way as God is in control of each condition, regardless of how terrible the situations might appear.
Moral justification in the Christian worldview
As the ailment develops, the morally recognized way that George should select compared to euthanasia involves calling for the clinician to halt particular modes of treatment. This comprises of getting him off a respirator for assisted breathing. Suppressing this treatment mechanism is standard as it allows the imminent death to happen. It similarly differs from euthanasia, as the aims are not triggering death but allowing a natural demise to happen. Subba et al. (2016) indicate that when death seems inevitable, it is customary to several treatment mechanisms and allow demise as persons continue offering compassionate care for the dying. This is understandable with Christ’s teachings of loving other individuals, as people discretely adore themselves. Treatment suppression is morally acceptable rather than euthanasia because if death is let to take its natural sequence, George is assured of receiving palliative care as his life slowly ends.
Decision-based on George’s situation
According to Inbadas et al. (2017), it may be relatively simple to establish a decision based on the Christianity worldview compared to the Worldview. Every health expert vows by the Hippocratic Oath before administering any medication that terminates the patient’s life. Regarding the oath, as a qualified health consultant, I might choose not to assimilate the usage of Euthanasia for George. Moreover, as a Christian, it may mean I should not dispense the drug since my religious conviction stringently condemns the dispensing of the drug. Based on the Christianity viewpoint, irrespective of George’s suffering, no person has the right to end his life. This is due to the Christianity viewpoint that signifies God’s treasure for humans. Conversely, founded of the Worldview, individuals possess the right to select whether to maintain restorative care or to proceed with euthanasia. Also, a patient’s autonomy should be appreciated, along with what the patient requires should be rendered.
Nonetheless, after evaluating George’s health situation, he might continue an ethical cause with the planned integration of euthanasia. Euthanasia is an important mode that presents individuals with the ability to prevent any pain and distress. Additionally, in other phases, regardless of being fed through other methods, for instance, tubes and incorporating life-support mechanisms, there is no likelihood of guaranteeing that his health status may improve or changing his situation. As a result, it might be seen to be appropriate to assimilate euthanasia.
Death is considered a painful experience that every person should contend with in life. Irrespective of how miserable the circumstances might be, humans’ lives bear an essential value and dignity that God has bestowed through his creation. Thus, being sanctified people, Christians should not choose euthanasia but allow His will to be manifested in Christians’ lives.
Inbadas, H., Zaman, S., Whitelaw, S., & Clark, D. (2017). Declarations on euthanasia and assisted dying. Death Studies, 41(9), 574-584.
Keown, J. (2018). Euthanasia, ethics and public policy: an argument against legalization. Cambridge University Press.
Sharp, S. (2019). The Bible and attitudes toward voluntary euthanasia. Death Studies, 43(4), 240-247.
Subba, S. H., Khullar, V., Latafat, Y., Chawla, K., Nirmal, A., & Chaudhary, T. (2016). Doctors’ Attitude Towards Euthanasia: A Cross-sectional Study. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 64, 44.
Worldview, (2017) Helping you better understand the world’s