Response to Post #1
The choice of use of children is a good decision by the organization and will have a good appeal to the target audience. Where children are used, it tends to create guilt to the adult involved in smoking habits. The use of them is a good idea and they have quality information at hand on the effects of the substance, in this case, being cigarettes smoking. This is based on some effects which no human would accept to suffer from this being the coloration of teeth, heart attack and stroke. It is a costly effect which can cause permanent conditions and costly to treat. The hard evidence instills fear and also the high cost of treatment of these conditions will make people stop the habit of smoking. The organization should focus more on the effects and this will create more fear on smoking habits.
Response to Post #2
The organization’s approach to persuading its audience to refrain from irresponsible and abusive actions is a good initiative. Children have a tendency of copying behaviors from the adults and how adults behave the children will make a choice from them. Having that children are developing and growing day by day the environment they grow in has an effect on their behaviors. Where children are exposed to the environment with irresponsible adults and many abusive actions they will grow knowing that this kind of mannerism is not bad and in the same way they will behave. The approach to persuade the adults to refrain from being irresponsible and stop abusive actions will help bring up a generation that will be responsible for their actions and also friendlier and with quality morals. The PSA made a good decision to address this.
