What is new and interesting is that the readings and assignments on writing are all extensive, aside from the fact that they are unique. Therefore, the first few weeks may prove to be difficult as most of the students seek to adjust the anticipations based on the course as well as try to understand the set objectives. Because the writing pedagogy is demanding on specific aspects such as engagement, reading, and critical thinking, it converts the standard FYC bell curve that enables a majority of the learners to achieve exceptional or failure. Additionally, students get to experience how academic researchers take authority for themselves and state opinions, therefore making writing more genuine.
However, I do agree that writing studies training is also compatible with understanding comprehension of the transfer. Proven methods of enabling transfer include self-reflection, a clear generalization of ideologies, and attentiveness to a person’s perspective. The act of teaching students based on a teacher’s knowledge of writing emboldens self-reflection and mindfulness. Therefore, it improves the probability that learners can maintain an attitude of analysis towards writing as they transcribe in various disciplines. Only with other applications of the training and longitudinal readings to evaluate scholars’ advanced inscription capabilities will we be able to tell if this concept exhibits out in practice.
It will enhance our understanding as tutors, our acquaintance and proficiency, and ways of communicating with learners to assist them in learning. To sum up, the concepts require us to examine ourselves as tutors carefully. Thinking through the rejection of mastery concepts and engaging in discussions presents all trainers with an essential theoretical task. It will assist in raising awareness about the presence of our discipline, but also what is conducted in the writing discipline.