Many countries around the globe have expressed their concern over the impact of air pollution on the environment, after encountering various challenges in leading a healthy lifestyle. In this regard, governments are now developing specific laws to curb pollution and discourage individuals from engaging in activities that can affect outcomes in their surroundings. For example, the Clean Air Act of 1990 seeks to address air quality standards, motor vehicle emissions, and toxic air pollutants among other pollution aspects. Even though the pollution prevention laws and policies are expected to curb pollution, their impact has been slow, given that the rate of contamination is on the rise. In an exciting twist of events, students are being taught on various approaches that can be used to conserve the environment. The focus is now on preparing the young population to become responsible citizens during their adult phase. Importantly, the different types of pollution have a significant impact on future generations because of their ability to influence the lifestyles of individuals in the world today. For instance, inhaling polluted air exposes individuals to a wide range of respiratory diseases such as asthma, which interfere with the overall lifespan. Individuals should examine the impact of the pollution laws on environmental conservation and identify strategies that could be used to enhance their effectiveness in the world today.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) holds polluters to account for their actions that jeopardize the move by the government to safeguard the environment for its people. Through its jurisdiction, EPA aims at reducing waste and cleaning harmful substances in the background, which could interfere with people’s lifestyles. By conducting research exercises to establish the changing needs of individuals, EPA oversees the facilitation of pollution prevention among other activities, which focus on improving people’s livelihoods (Isen, Rossin-Slater, and Reed 860). However, understanding EPA’s mission creates an exciting conversation that provokes the thought process of individuals to explore different approaches that can be used to overcome modern-day problems. From this realization, it is evident the U.S. government has embarked on a keen process of encouraging individuals to protect the environment by demonstrating the consequences that can accrue from inconsiderate actions. Under the Clean Air Act, corporations that comply with the outlined regulations stand a chance to receive permit waivers, a move that acts as an encouragement for individuals to embrace the culture of safeguarding the environment.
It should be noted that the Clean Air Act of 1990 is the genesis of any regulation that aims at curbing pollution in the world today. By far, this prevention law authorizes EPA to develop specific health standards that seek to protect the public from the consequences of actions initiated by corporations in the world today. For instance, the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) is one of the strategies that cushion the citizenry from suffering any oversights from the corporate world (Sheldon 3181). By introducing NAAQS to every state in the U.S., the regulation would create and promote a culture of responsibility where the environment would be protected from the deliberate actions of individuals and corporations. In 2011, the Obama Administration indicated that the Clean Ait Act had eliminated air pollutants that lead to smog by more than 60% (Zichal). From this revelation, the economy had improved due to the reduction of pollution, while electricity production had gone up with the prices declined. For this reason, the government’s decision to attribute the success of the act to visible improvements provided a glimpse of hope to humanity with the continued use of law reforms to eliminate pollutants.
According to existing research, the Clean Air Act contributes immensely to the economy through the creation of an enabling environment to realize innovation and job opportunities. Dupont, Kumar, and Louis argue that through its stringent measures, the act has compelled corporations to embark on a process of developing cutting-edge solutions that address different issues affecting individuals in their immediate environment (5). From this observation, the corporate world has discovered viable products and solutions that limit pollutants from coming into contact with the public. In this regard, the act was said to have saved 160,000 lives in 2010, with the numbers expected to grow to 230,000 by 2020 (Tucker 2). While these statistics were released by EPA, many individuals continue to question its viability, especially with the inception of new technologies that affect people’s lives in the world today. The revolutionary technologies are unpredictable because of their unanticipated impact that can change the conversation on protecting the environment and people’s lives.
On its part, the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 was developed to spur interest among stakeholders concerning the consideration of cost-effective measures to reduce the impact of pollution in the world today. As per the act, the U.S. government is expected to create an enabling environment where people can pursue their objectives without facing any threats from external context. By exploring factors that enhance pollution, the act recommended eradicating the vice from the source (Williams). From this realization, individuals have discovered numerous advantages associated with the law because of its ability to curb the cause of pollution before spreading to other regions. Importantly, the law has been monumental in establishing an activity where people can be protected from any effects of pollution emerging from accidents such as an offshore oil spillage. Even though the focus of this act has been majorly on source reduction, corporations have been urged to review their methodologies to ascertain any challenges that hinder individuals from discovering their potential.
Individuals should examine the impact of the pollution laws on environmental conservation and identify strategies that could be used to enhance their effectiveness in the world today. The U.S. government has been at the forefront of developing policies that focus on eradicating pollution in the world today. On the one hand, the Clean Air Act has been attributed to the saving of 160,000 lives that could have succumbed to different ailments associated with pollution. By curbing pollution through source reduction, the Pollution Prevention Act hopes to create a conversation among industry players on the best approaches that can be used to safeguard the environment. However, there is an opportunity for policymakers to identify any flaws that hinder the existing laws from realizing their desired objectives.