The essay primarily focuses on analyzing the importance and processes of adopting research ethics as a practice. As well, the essay comprehensively analyzes the importance and relevance of producing a literature review as a critical aspect of expanding the body of knowledge, honesty, truth, authenticity, and objectivity. The adoption of research ethics in the academic discipline is essential and has profound implications on the expansion of the body of knowledge. The research ethics facilitates responsible publications, honesty, integrity, openness, respect for colleagues, confidentiality, legality, objectivity, authenticity, among other social norms. The respect, recognition, and appreciation of other people’s work(s) is a fundamental aspect of adopting research ethics. The ability to ascertain authenticity, truth, competence, and evading of errors in fundamental in the research discipline. Thus, the adoption of research ethics shows a degree of dedication, creativity, and responsible publication of contents in different fields and disciplines.
Adopting Research Ethics
The adoption of research ethics stipulates a set of rules and guidelines that outline the norms of conduct. The use of research ethics is a fundamental aspect that promotes moral and social value in the subject in which the project is focused on expanding (Block et al. 2012). Masic et al. (2014) assert that the norms of conduct stipulate the significance of respecting another person’s work. This amounts in the value accorded to maintaining originality, objective, and authentic publication. As a result, the impact on advancing the spread of moral and social values that guide the conduct of professional scholars, authors, and publishers. The norms of conduct stipulate the need to respect and value other people’s work as much as one would expect their work to be respected and recognized across different disciplines (Masic et al. 2014). Thus, the adoption of research ethics help promotes core values and moral tendencies that guide the study of different disciplines.
Stichler (2014) state that “nothing is more exciting than seeing your name in print as the author of a well-written article in a respected, peer-reviewed, scholarly journal.” As the ultimate goal of the research, the production of evidence-based, authentic, and thoroughly presented ideas is a key objective for research ethics. This culminates in the development of respect and reputation developed by a work of publication. The author’s ultimate goal is to ascertain positive development and transformation of the discipline through the introduction of new ideas of his/her own informed by evidence and theories. The theorization of the research relies on research ethics to ensure authentic data and processes have been utilized in acquiring the research findings. Thus, research ethics is important in factualizing the final work in which authors and scholars produce to expand the discipline of study.
According to Wasserman (2013), the use of improper data analysis and research processes encourage the development of false or misleading conclusions. This presents the significance of utilizing research ethics practices to ensure correct and true conclusions development. The line between falsehood and true conclusions and theories developed in research is asserted by the ethical practices employed in data collection and analysis (Stichler 2014). The conduct of research must ascertain the utilization of ethical practices to guarantee the development of essential conclusions and theorization. This is a profoundly important aspect that ensures remains in the stipulated realm. Masic et al. (2014) stipulates that the expansion of research and future studies can only prevail based on the utilization of research ethics that expand the data collection, findings, analysis, and conclusions. Thus, to command respect and good reputation – the adoption of research ethics profoundly impacts the study projects and disciplines.
The process of adopting research ethics follows the adherence to the norms of conduct that guide data acquisition, analysis, and development of conclusions. Singh (2012) note that “to know the truth, we require a reliable and consistent way of thinking.” That is an approach which is not subjective to avoid limited assessments and making of conclusions that are falsified or cannot be independently verifiable. This culminates in refuting the developed knowledge as authentic, objective, truthful, open-minded, rational, and honest. The lack of honest inquiry serves as a shot on the leg for the research that fails to meet ethical standards from start to the developed conclusions deemed falsified. Therefore, following the core processes of adopting research ethics is study projects and expansion of study disciplines.
The best process of ascertaining the adoption of research ethics practices is the employment of scientific approaches in data inquiry, collection, analysis, and conclusions. The scientific approach stipulates many processes to adhere to meeting all the required expectations and standards. The scientific approach stimulates a process devoid of data fabrication and altering. The scientific approach ascertains the verification, testing, and validation of the acquired information (Laberee 2009). In the process, the conclusions are guaranteed of future verification and validation using different sets of data to arrive at the same conclusion. Thus, the scientific method provides the best approach in which research ethics can be assured in the study projects and expansion of knowledge.
According to Stichler (2014), the analysis of previous literature provides a foundation in which present and future recommendations can be articulated in research projects. The literature review exists to provide a background of the past theories and arguments put forward on the subject. This gives the theoretical foundation in which research and future recommendations can be based. Block et al. (2012) assert that the prevalence of literature review presents diverse views from different scholars to give a relevant and unbiased foundation in which you aim to introduce your own opinions. As a result, the impact on the expansion of the study a discipline – a body of knowledge on the subject. The production of literature review gives the necessary backing to diversionary views presented by new research. Thus, continuous academic development can be sustained in the present and future endeavors.
In the development of research projects, the utilization of literature reviews provides the initial explanation of the problem at hand. The literature review comprises of the established knowledge on the topic. This is critical as it provides a conceptual understanding of the topic background. Giraud et al. (2019) discusses that the study background understanding enables the scholar to develop new theories that add to existing knowledge. This is a fundamental aspect which provides researchers with a comprehensive and relevant pool of supporting resources to the research project (Singh 2012). The arguments can be based upon a body of existing materials in the discipline.
Furthermore, the literature review is important as it provides a rationale in which the framework of the study is based. The theoretical framework of the research topic is utilized to facilitate the conceptualization of the problem (Masic et al. 2014). This is important to enhance the scholar to expand the body with factual information and analysis of data in relation to the existing theories. Thus, an in-depth reading provided by the literature review create an extensive overview of the research and guide how to go about the process.
The relevance of the literature review is based on the fact that it provides a body of supporting materials in which to back up the research work. According to Lo et al. (2019) the materials are equipped with enormous insights that provide a conceptualization of the background understanding of the study. As well, the literature review relevance is based on the rationale they give to the framework of the study (Labaree 2009). That is, the review of the existing literature help research to make their mind, acquire critical ideas, access valuable data, and steer the research process of his/her project. The understanding of the literature review creates a better understanding of the problem (Winchester & Salji 2016). Thus, give room for further expansion and the making of informed data inquiry approaches.
The understanding of literature review enables the researcher to familiarize themselves with the body of knowledge in which they embark to expand. This induces relevant insights to the subject through an in-depth understanding of the subject through analysis of diverse opinions and views (Winchester & Salji 2016). Furthermore, the views can be incorporated to contribute to the expansion of the subject under study.
In conclusion, the analysis in the importance and processes of adopting research ethics is lacking as a core subject of study. This provides a fundamental gap in which the project can contribute to its expansion. The essay stipulates the need for further research and insights for adopting research ethics. The significance of ethics is core to ascertain originality, authenticity, objectivity, and creativity in the future. Thus, diverse disciplines cam be expanded and improved. The analysis of the importance and relevance of producing literature reviews is lacking a crucial subject to inform researchers the need for ethical practices. This presents a profound gap in informing researchers about the significance of utilizing literature reviews, how, and in what aspects is essential to advance future studies. Thus, the use of scientific approaches in both sciences and arts is fundamental to provide a base for verification, testing, and validation.
Block, K., Warr, D., Gibbs, L., & Riggs, E. (2012). Addressing ethical and methodological challenges in research with refugee-background young people: reflections from the field. Journal of Refugee Studies, 26(1), 69-87.
Giraud, C., Cioffo, G. D., Kervyn de Lettenhove, M., & Ramirez Chaves, C. (2019). Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1-17.
Labaree, R. V. (2009). Research Guides: Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: 5. The Literature Review.
Lo, A. Y., Grotevant, H. D., & McRoy, R. G. (2019). Ethical Considerations in Adoption Research: Navigating Confidentiality and Privacy Across the Adoption Kinship Network. Adoption Quarterly, 22(1), 75-93.
Masic, I., Hodzic, A., & Mulic, S. (2014). Ethics in medical research and publication. International journal of preventive medicine, 5(9), 1073.
Singh, S. (2012). Ethics in research. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology, 78(4), 411.
Stichler, J. F. (2014). The ethics of research, writing, and publication.
Wasserman, R. (2013). Ethical issues and guidelines for conducting data analysis in psychological research. Ethics & behavior, 23(1), 3-15.
Winchester, C. L., & Salji, M. (2016). Writing a literature review. Journal of Clinical Urology, 9(5), 308-312.