The death penalty attracts mixed criticism because of the different moral perspectives held by individuals towards the form of a criminal sentence. Different authors have created various assertions that have a significant impact on the thought process of individuals and their understanding of the aspect of justice. Bingzhi and Yuan (9) discuss the outcomes by focusing on the Chinese context and how those found guilty of various acts of crime are treated. While a section of the crimes attracts a death penalty, activities in Mainland China have been advocating for the government to abolish the form of sentencing because of its inability to promote justice. Li, Dennis, and Hong (260) believe that China’s frequency in the issuance of death penalties contradicts the rules of social existence and the calls for justice. By comparing judicial resolutions in China and the U.S., readers are urged to understand the impact of death penalties on the outcomes caused by the form of sentencing on culprits from different cultural backgrounds.
Rhetorical Analysis: Article One
Bingzhi and Yuan seek judicial reform in China after analyzing various issues hindering their ability to develop viable solutions in their immediate environment. Based on the changing needs of individuals, the justice system should be investigated and exposed to thorough criticism that seeks answers from the responsible parties that contribute to the significant outcomes developed by courts in China. In the last ten years, China’s Supreme Court has made tremendous steps in implementing various approaches that focus on improving people’s perspectives towards the criminal justice system. Creating awareness regarding the impact of judicial review on the death penalty might be misplaced because of the limited understanding of individuals that affects their focus towards life. While different criminal acts attract mixed reactions regarding the type of sentencing that can be issued by a judge, enabling individuals to understand the various outcomes that the justice system can achieve within a specific timeline. Abolishing the death penalty in China’s justice system might have a varied impact that defines the overall understanding of individuals regarding the implementation of the different aspects of the law.
According to organizations such as Amnesty International that are focused on promoting justice around the globe, China is the most active country that executes many people compared to any other nation. From this realization, Bingzhi and Yuan posit that the Supreme Court in the country is under pressure to review its approach towards criminal justice and its ability to make informed decisions when ruling on different capital offense cases. However, the country continues to face a challenge in its reform strategy that interferes with the overall perspectives of individuals regarding the best measures that should be undertaken to popularize the moves. Given the changing nature of individuals in their immediate environment, Chinese citizens deserve a break from the retrogressive and punitive measures adopted by the government. The authors demonstrate various approaches that can be taken in China to abolish the death penalty in the country.
Rhetorical Analysis: Article Two
In the legal context, decisions should be issued based on the evidence presented by the prosecution and the arguments fronted by the defense outlining the need to review the innocence of the accused persons. While different countries have various punitive measures for numerous criminal acts, there is a need to apply leniency and offer informative sessions where individuals are aware of the values that interfere with their approaches towards life. When engaging the public on legal outcomes, individuals should be informed about their ability to comply with the specified processes that allow one to seek justice. Understanding the differences between the U.S. criminal justice system and that of China provides one with a certain level of comprehension, which will enable them to make informed decisions. Even though China imposes numerous death sentences on a wide range of cases, exploring the possibility of a justice waiver and abolishment of the death penalty can enhance the overall perceptions towards the justice system. For this reason, creating viable solutions that equip individuals with a certain level of awareness allows people to discover the issues and their approaches towards life.
By analyzing the approaches that the justice system can be exploited, Li, Dennis, and Hong believe that having a conversation based on the impact of death penalties conflict the rules of social existence. Capital offenses around the globe attract extreme punitive measures where individuals are punished for their actions. Although sanctions have been proposed to terminate death penalties in China, little has been done to improve outcomes in the courtrooms. Li, Dennis, and Hong opine that death sentencing has a significant impact on the gender and racial background of the accused persons. In many instances, death penalties are issued based on a specific approach that appears to conflict the role of justice in the modern world. By understanding the nature of changing needs in the contemporary world, individuals are supposed to benefit from an efficient and effective system that focuses on improving people’s needs and their approaches towards life. Based on the impact of death penalties, reviewing outcomes in the Chinese legal context creates an enabling environment for people to address issues affecting the varying needs in the world today.
Synthesis of the Analysis
Li, Dennis, and Hong impress the reader by introducing a comparison between the U.S. justice system and the interpretation of the law in the Chinese context. On many occasions, individuals are expected to realize their desired objectives by seeking justice from the criminal system. Unlike other countries, China enforces the death penalty more than any other country around the globe. From this realization, the ability of individuals to encounter justice in their interaction is defined by the need to improve their understanding of the death sentence. By analyzing the impact of the death sentence on gender and the racial background, individuals understand the changing needs of individuals and their perspectives on the decision-making process in the justice system. Importantly, the legal aspects that contribute to the issuance of a death sentence are influenced by the nature of a criminal act, which the scholars indicate that the courts should lessen their urge to issue a death penalty.
Bingzhi and Yuan review the probability of achieving a judicial reform in China and altering the responses that can be made in the country’s legal context. Changing the death penalty could have a wide range of positive outcomes that shape individual needs and their ability to overcome issues affecting individuals in their immediate environment. While Bingzhi and Yuan propose death penalties in China should be abolished, their ability to demonstrate the aspects that will be realized to create a perfect setting for different stakeholders to consider the recommended practices. By evaluating the scope of the criminal acts, China’s penal and justice system should be held to account for its many death sentences that appear to define its legal approaches.
By comparing judicial resolutions in China and the U.S., readers are urged to understand the impact of death penalties on the outcomes caused by the form of sentencing on culprits from different cultural backgrounds. Understanding people’s needs and their attitudes towards the legal reforms creates a perfect talking point where authors in the two articles discuss and share their input. By reviewing the progress of the death penalty, individuals are exposed to an enabling environment that creates viable solutions for individuals seeking justice in the criminal system. Many people believe that the death penalty should be abolished to promote human values and the need for people to appeal for the establishment of a lesser ruling when seeking justice in the Chinese courts. Bingzhi and Yuan propose a series of policies that should be introduced in China to enable the country to abolish the death penalty. On their part, Li, Dennis, and Hong developed a set of informative recommendations that can be embraced by China’s legal and justice system. For this reason, abolishing the death sentence in China requires collective input from different stakeholders to achieve the desired objectives.