Assignment Questions NEW
Part 1:
1-1: Define fraud and identify a potentially fraudulent situation.
1-3: Describe the services that a forensic accountant might provide related to a marital dispute.
1-5: Explain the theory of the fraud triangle.
1-8: Give examples of non-fraud forensic and litigation advisory engagements.
1-10: Explain fraud examination methodology.
Part 2:
Short Case: Respond to the questions asked at the conclusion of the following case:
What should Sue Evans do? Should she contact the police? Should she hire an external forensic accountant? How might a forensic accountant help in this case? Specifically, what could the forensic accountant do that Sue’s internal auditors could not do?
